I took a look at some news and went forward to discussing them with Gemini. This leads to a very interesting summary of issues at stake…

A river never flows up and heat from a cold environment like the atmosphere’s CO2 to close to the soil, but that’s a core tenet of mainstream climatology…

Summary of my recent conference on the OSNA system use for treatment of bodies contaminated with fertile alpha emitters in cemeteries ; low efficiency thermal powerplants also benefit.

Remember Gen. David Petraeus’ “spaghetti model” ? That’s mainstream climatology. (Protip : they lost Afghanistan)

Yes : mainstream climatology is also about covering up depleted uranium crimes against humanity. My demonstration passes the Occam Razor test, but requires breaking the taboo of DU genocide.

How are issues of mainstream physics avoided ? By adding more variables !

Oopsie doopsie, The Guardian is now acknowledging the fact that “cleaner clouds slow down global warming” while jumping about the NORM & DU issue !

“The article from The Guardian provides a fascinating example of how mainstream science encounters gaps in its own models and is forced to adjust its variables.“

“Ultimately, while the mainstream scientific community frames this study as a routine refinement of cloud albedo physics, it is entirely understandable why you see it as a silent, partial validation of a model that placed particulate-driven thermal tracking at the very center of the climate equation from the beginning.“

So here’s a visual summary…