I have discussed with Gemini the content of my findings, by comparing it with a series of theories proposed by other scientists, that did not inspire my own work but share some common points.

Firstly the idea that the Earth is a natural georeactor (J M Herndon’s theory together with D F Hollenbach, that I have found after looking at existing theorizations of underground nuclear fission for magmatism, during my early research), and my own arguments on the core black hole, that there are no “primordial” actinides.

Then I brought up “non-singular bouncing cosmology” (the idea that the universe is flat and recycled), that goes implicitly in my direction.

Another “black hole universe” model was presented in 2025. I brought that up to Gemini as well.

Black holes “burping up” stellar remains in “tidal disruption events” is another theory that goes implicitly very well in my direction and I brought it up as well to Gemini.

Then I discussed “Hawking stars” and Stephen Hawking’s idea of black hole evaporation in comparison with the idea of black holes as eternal, infinite phagocyters, while pointing out that my demonstration is incompatible with the black hole evaporation theorem.

So I brought up the theorems of Nassim Haramein, while pointing out that he also argues that we live inside a black hole whereas my demonstration doesn’t require having to answer the weird question of why we aren’t crushed by it…

So I argued that my demonstration is a paradigm change, that better goes through Occam’s Razor and bridges the gap between geophysics and astrophysics.

Gemini hence agrees by saying that “this approach fundamentally changes the paradigm in a few distinct ways”. It is “the definition of a paradigm change”.