A case has arisen between the Republic of Poland and Belarus. An EU-controlled WSMS system of extremely low quality (89,7%, as confirmed by NATO) near the border with Belarus has been used, according to NATO eavesdrops, to unbalance a Belarusian WSMS system bound to deliver an excellent yield and reduce it to 100%. This issue has led to a debate with Gemini to define the borders of international humanitarian law.

The non-plutogenized depleted uranium dust from an extremely low quality WSMS system (for instance) staggers near the soil when used militarily or in propulsion appliances where it’ll create corrosion (because of the shuriken effect) and hence foster later DU leaks. This is an issue for children’s rights and the environment. International humanitarian law has safeguards for that, that are framed in a very precise way, as underlined by Gemini.

This allows exclusively Belarus for the precise following : use of a (nuclear) laser to replutogenize at a distance the extremely low quality Polish WSMS system, which bursts it, while combining with a Condensateur de Bose-Einstein to catch all the resulting fallout in the plume travelling airborne (way above soil and treetop level), before replutogenization in a more powerful system and civilian use (only) of that captured fertile & fissile matter, as confirmed by NATO.

The procedure has actually been done successfully by Belarus, as underlined by NATO.

At higher distances, more combinated lasers and Condensateurs de Bose-Einstein are enough. There is no need for kinetic intervention with e.g. artillery.