I am faced with the case of the beginning of the use of the zyklon-C cans from what happened in 2022 in western Ukraine. Replutogenization in boiling water has started to happen. Since the systems involved seem to emit winds and Omaot (limited amounts of useful plutonium), they’re not overall a target. The bacteriological issue (remember my Pandora box peer reviewed article ?) is at their own risks.

DNA needs to reincarnate. It’s our Buddhist work to consider that. Should the DNA be spread from where it comes from ? This is an interesting possibility but indeed causes possibly another bacteriological risk. Indeed what would be possible is to foster nuclear core use for electricity production. This can create through maceration if the power is too low (a natural characteristic of crematory / mash systems) a bacteriological / viral risk.  The DNA would be spread naturally when Russian missiles come and detect these units through their crematory antigravitons. But this is quite wrong in terms of public health. Even though an idea could be to use the water motor after replutogenization in fluorine and throw the remaining ashes, after fuel burn, in the water, it all depends on the “quality” of the targets and the 2022 “material” seems very poor.

It’s also possible that the best way is to let Ukraine use it for strikes in Russia and see the DNA scattered through that medium. Here’s an example :

But this also causes a disease risk on the local population. Since it’s too rich in alpha emitters.

So the correct compromise is in my opinion to mix the brains and retchlagmash swabs with alpha emitters of uranium mine tailings in spinning water motors (from my peer reviewed article) to extract some energy in electricity production while plutogenizing a bit (the max possible is 66% in crematory matter), before firing the remaining plutonium onto the enemy. This is because the varsity of uranium mine tailings alpha emitters will likely create enough heat within the cores (through immediate transmutation and fission, whereas for U238 to Pu239 there is a ~ 3 days delay) to reduce strongly the bacteriological / virological risk, but at the same time offering a plutonium more likely to undergo good criticities that will reduce the disease risk to the populations near the targets.

Because the starting material is of poor quality, there shall nevertheless be a lot of crematory antigravitons. But there is no magical solution. I am prioritizing health. Could these enrichment units be protected by the IAEA ? It’s a possibility but I think they will be against the military component, strongly. And the military component is needed to reduce the maceration risk.

The DNA comes from the West of Ukraine (Jews and Magyars). But if spread again there, there’s a distant probability it happens again later. To this dilemma, the answer fits nevertheless quite well with the above solution.