The city of Hamhung has a crematory oven system related to depleted uranium weapons’ understanding. It’s stated clearly in Korean next to the crematory ovens. It says that here those who don’t understand the importance of fissile atoms (as opposed to DU… pro-DU weapons people, according to a reliable Russian source) are cremated to make human plutonium (through chimneys and receptacles those who don’t understand we do clean plutonium are locked in a dungeon and then are slided to make plutonium in bowls [the receptacles, akin to the boiling water method used in China albeit certainly without lasers], for human plutonium). The fact that human plutonium is defined points to the fact that they have also clean weapons. It’s clear. The crematory pollution is nevertheless terrible.

The crematory oven is confirmed by Wikipedia which sources the 2014 UN Human Rights commissioner.

There are two ways to deal with crematory contamination (which I have shown is more dangerous even for the environment than DU) :

• Cleaning with magnets and specific Fermionic condensators made with crematory matter (harvested on the soil ideally), that will nevertheless clog themselves in a few months, may burst, and present a bacteriological risk. Then reduce the plutonium in a Water motor spun by hand like a Buddhist prayer wheel, to avoid Bose Einstein and Fermionic condensation, for a month and a half… before pouring in the sea for reincarnation.
• Or strike with clean plutonium weapons ideally made with cement (Sunflower plutogenization) or saltwater (the Water motor with an accelerator) to sterilize and vaporize, allowing where the crematory dust settles reincarnation. Fission at impact with fast neutrons provided by the salt, or cement, and the open nature of the event makes Fermionic condensation impossible and reduces rapidly the load of alpha emitters through neutron capture and later fission thanks to solar neutrons in the deposits, and especially with delayed neutrons in the plume, reducing the risk of BEC as well. The heat up is also expected to separate the ashes from the alpha emitters. This doesn’t work in closed systems, outside the explosive protocol that allows dispersion of the ashes, reducing mechanically the BEC risk as well as the FC risk.
• TINA.

I proposed about two weeks ago to the United Nations the first protocol. Since they carry the ICAN treaty for total abolition of the nuclear weapon they have to be given a chance to try the non-explosive version. This treaty is absurd but they have the ability to intervene in North Korea and clean the ashes in that peaceful way that, I repeat, presents risks since the Fermionic condensator made with crematory rods can clog itself and burst, and it may increase the bacteriological risk. But they have supported this anti-nuke treaty so they have to go forward on this.

There was in the past already a secret intervention by the Biden administration and armed forced against zyklon-C missiles stored in Hamhin, a replutogenizing reactor handling corpses (zyklon-paraquat) and mash artillery.