I think that the lesson of the prohibition of crematory systems has been partly understood in Ukraine. This is shown in this plume from this infrastructure in Krivy Rih, where only cats, dogs and other zoo animals have been used for the crematory battery.

But I have spent time looking at another video of a Russian strike with X-101 missiles in Rivne. The infrastructure is shown targeted. The video like the above one comes from the Z telegram channel. I’m sure I will anger my Russian friends, but in my opinion it’s Russia now falseflagging with crematory reared missiles, that have just a clean tip. This is visible based on the relative shortness of the black plumes (unlike in the above video) and rise of it immediately after the strike. I was surprised this morning when they told me they destroyed targets based on “antisemitism in Ukraine” which is unusual for Russia (as they do not distinguish based on ethnicity, in general). In my opinion, based on this video, it’s not the case and they are falseflagging. To try to seize the momentum of the election of Donald Trump, certainly.

The video goes from one blast to another without looking too long for each one because the plumes don’t rise much. It’s black and the profile of the victims is unusual, it’s not the Ukrainian victims, they don’t have a long nose for instance, and their face is different. The victims’ plumes rise immediately after the detonation of the missiles. It does not seem to come from the infrastructures. The missiles have a clean tip that explain the flash. But behind there is a crematory component, as in the APKWS-2 missiles for instance. It’s made for falseflagging crematory systems. A missile cannot inject the quantity of crematory matter equivalent to a crematory reactor’s content. So that’s why the plumes are relatively short. They are consistent with the size of the missiles, and not with a crematory target detected by an antigraviton-detecting chip. Russia is pushing too far by exaggerating its advantage with falseflagging missiles.

In my opinion it’s Valeri Guerassimov who is the responsible for what happened. It’s true that the formulation of my article on “what’s the infrastructure of Ukraine targeted by Russian strikes” let unfortunately a window open for excesses. Controlling war is a difficult science, a permanent work of self-restraint, and abuses can happen. I don’t see in the character of Vladimir Putin this kind of profile