No one can deny anymore that electric vehicles heat up the climate

Let’s compare two pictures: the May 2024 heat anomaly and the market share of electric vehicles per country in Europe :

October 2023 article https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/new-registrations-of-electric-vehicles – as concerns the UK, the 2024 data is of 23,9% https://citaevcharger.co.uk/uk-and-electric-cars-ev-market-stats-2024/#:~:text=As%20of%20the%20end%20of%20February%202024%2C%20the%20total%20market,further%20620%2C000%20plug%2Din%20hybrids.

The reason is simple : photosynthesis is endothermic. It absorbs heat together with CO2. AI acknowledged this :

This means that while plants absorb CO2 to grow, they also absorb heat (the reaction of photosynthesis consumes heat to happen). Hence, in countries with a rush on electric vehicles, the lack of photosynthesis is translated into a peak of temperatures, and one can see through the geographic data how it is linear with the rate of adoption of EVs, with Norway coming first having the redder areas, etc. As concerns the UK, a clear finding on Scotland :

The yield of thermal motors has improved strongly, allowing for CO2 to be emitted without transporting as much heat (I talk of “cold CO2”), allowing it to cool down the environment strongly through photosynthesis. The fact is that CO2 is used in fire extinguishers. It’s the same phenomenon at another scale. Advanced countries get “cold CO2” emissions at a strong rate creating the peculiar dynamics of e.g. France, northern Italy and northern Spain on the map. But areas with lots of EVs drift on the other direction because of the deficit in photosynthesis.

It’s also important to remind that photosynthesis is essential for agricultural yields. In Norway grain yields were almost slashed in half between 2022 and 2023.

I heard that “plants lose nutritional value when grown with more CO2”. You already eat a lot of tomatoes and other food products grown in a greenhouse with CO2 additions without knowing it. The argument of the “loss of nutritional value” (stuff like iron and zinc, and it’s even claimed, proteins in grain !) is akin to saying that the bread that awaited the customers of the bread lines in the USSR was more nutritious and healthy ! “We don’t care if there is less bread, it shall be more yummy and healthy !” – can you believe that ? Soviet propaganda worked the same way.

They ate “more healthy”… until they could not eat anymore because all was diverted to the military-industrial complex and bread lines started to emerge. It’s a clear known fact of the history of the USSR and the data shows that history is repeating but that the new USSR is in the West.